Updated oclhashcat benchmark with opengl 7970

A few years ago I benched marked the amd 7970 Ghz GPU with the oclhashcat-plus software. so here is an updated results. 

Since there is no longer any active development with the plus line of oclhashcat we are going to just run the oclhashcat version since it was combined. If your liking to compare these results bellow with results from last time to see how the performance changed check out it here.
oclHashcat v1.36 starting in benchmark-mode...

Device #1: Tahiti, 2614MB, 1100Mhz, 32MCU

Hashtype: MD4
Workload: 1024 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 17474.1 MH/s
Hashtype: MD5
Workload: 1024 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 8397.4 MH/s
Hashtype: SHA1
Workload: 1024 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 3254.0 MH/s
Hashtype: SHA256
Workload: 512 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 1018.5 MH/s
Hashtype: SHA384
Workload: 256 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 460.8 MH/s
Hashtype: SHA512
Workload: 256 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 460.2 MH/s
Hashtype: SHA-3(Keccak)
Workload: 512 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 198.7 MH/s
Hashtype: RipeMD160
Workload: 512 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 1723.3 MH/s
Hashtype: Whirlpool
Workload: 512 loops, 32 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 62281.8 kH/s
Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-94
Workload: 512 loops, 64 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 121.7 MH/s
Hashtype: SAP CODVN B (BCODE)
Workload: 1024 loops, 64 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 763.6 MH/s
Hashtype: SAP CODVN F/G (PASSCODE)
Workload: 512 loops, 32 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 160.9 MH/s
Hashtype: SAP CODVN H (PWDSALTEDHASH) iSSHA-1
Workload: 1024 loops, 16 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 1968.3 kH/s
Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 5
Workload: 128 loops, 32 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 145.7 MH/s
Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 6
Workload: 128 loops, 32 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 22548.4 kH/s
Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 8
Workload: 1024 loops, 64 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 238.5 kH/s
Hashtype: SHA-1(Base64), nsldap, Netscape LDAP SHA
Workload: 1024 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 3253.8 MH/s
Hashtype: SSHA-1(Base64), nsldaps, Netscape LDAP SSHA
Workload: 1024 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 3251.9 MH/s
Hashtype: descrypt, DES(Unix), Traditional DES
Workload: 128 loops, 64 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 126.4 MH/s
Hashtype: md5crypt, MD5(Unix), FreeBSD MD5, Cisco-IOS MD5
Workload: 1000 loops, 32 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 3893.8 kH/s
Hashtype: sha256crypt, SHA256(Unix)
Workload: 1024 loops, 4 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 78629 H/s
Hashtype: sha512crypt, SHA512(Unix)
Workload: 1024 loops, 8 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 3852 H/s
Hashtype: bcrypt, Blowfish(OpenBSD)
Workload: 32 loops, 2 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 4022 H/s
Hashtype: LM
Workload: 128 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 1431.4 MH/s
Hashtype: NTLM
Workload: 1024 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 17329.4 MH/s
Hashtype: DCC, mscash
Workload: 1024 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 4440.6 MH/s
Hashtype: NetNTLMv1-VANILLA / NetNTLMv1+ESS
Workload: 1024 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 9904.0 MH/s
Hashtype: NetNTLMv2
Workload: 512 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 551.0 MH/s
Hashtype: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth etype 23
Workload: 128 loops, 32 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 42565.9 kH/s
Hashtype: EPiServer 6.x < v4
Workload: 1024 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 2351.0 MH/s

some noticable differences are MD5 hashes went up by 1.2BH/s and NTLM went up by 7.2BH/s and probably most notable is the sha512 went from 89MH/s to 460MH/s

And here is an example of what that means using a mask attack on a password policy and human behaviour. we are assuming the password starts with a capital and then follows by at least 3 lower-case letters and then ends with a symbol. so if your password policy is that it needs a capital, lower, number, and special symbol and 8 or more characters long. this would be your attack.  with in 16m you have the password cracked.

hope you enjoyed,
Local Tech Repair Admin